Best holiday destinations in June
02 May 2024
By clicking a retailer link you consent to third party cookies that track your onward journey. If you make a purchase, Which? will receive an affiliate commission which supports our mission to be the UK's consumer champion.
Air travel has found itself at the centre of the debate on climate change.
There’s no denying that it’s carbon intensive: each passenger on a return flight from London to Singapore accounts for around three tonnes of CO2. That’s the equivalent of heating a family home for a year.
Flying less isn’t something everyone is able or willing to do. This has given rise to carbon offsetting schemes, which promise to make flights carbon neutral.
The idea is that we voluntarily calculate the CO2 we’re responsible for, then fund a project that reduces emissions by the same amount. Popular schemes include tree planting, wind farms and the distribution of fuel-efficient stoves in developing countries.
There are plenty of carbon calculators that ask you to input your flight route or an amount of CO2 in kg. They then calculate a suggested donation to offset the impact of your journey.
Around 2% of Which? members told us they always pay to offset their flights. That figure is actually higher than the national average of just 1%, according to the International Air Transport Association (IATA).
The easiest way would be to opt in when paying for your flights online. However, when we checked, only four of the 11 most-used airlines were offering their own schemes – and the convenient option isn't necessarily the best.
For example, Ryanair’s projects included tree planting in Ireland and Portugal. Yet these initiatives would offset less than 0.01% of Ryanair’s emissions, according to Professor Simon Lewis of University College London. He has branded the scheme ‘woefully inadequate’ and a ‘green gimmick rather than a serious attempt to slow down climate change’.
Instead of using the airlines' schemes, those who want to offset their carbon emissions should go to non-profit Atmosfair. Not all airlines are included in its flight calculator, but it also gives you the average carbon estimate for your route. If you have been given a CO2 estimate elsewhere, you can type the value into Atmosfair's 'offset a desired amount of CO2' calculator and make a one off payment. Another reliable source is ICAO's calculator.
To make sure you choose an effective scheme, look for internationally recognised certification. VCS (Verified Carbon Standard) and Gold Standard are two you can trust.
There are many reasons why people aren’t buying into carbon offsetting schemes. Responsible Travel argues that to tackle climate change we must actively reduce our carbon footprint, rather than trying to ‘cancel out’ the damage afterwards.
Sarah Leugers of the Gold Standard told Which? Travel: ‘Offsetting isn't the solution or the only thing we should be considering, but most of us can’t reduce our footprint to zero. Taking accountability for the remaining pollution is absolutely the right thing to do.’
Its search tool will highlight the greenest flight for your journey with a leaf motif, alongside the percentage of CO2 saved. An investigation by Which? Travel found that passengers can make a significant carbon reduction by changing which airline they fly with.
Business and first class are responsible for up to four times more CO2 per passenger. See which carriers came top in our survey of best and worst airlines.
Look out for newer, more fuel-efficient models, such as the Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner and Airbus A350-900 and A320neo.
Choose direct where possible. Taking off uses more fuel than cruising.
A heavier plane also guzzles more fuel.
Consider taking the train for short-haul journeys. The Eurostar emits around 90% less carbon than the equivalent flight.